A Conflict of "Rights"
For The Tacoma News Tribune
May, 2002
A Jewish story: Once a husband and wife
each paid separate visits to their rabbi. The husband visited
first. “Rabbi,” he said, “my wife is horrible,” and he
proceeded to list the many reasons why.
The rabbi said, “You’re right. She really
is horrible.”
Then came his wife. “Rabbi, I’ve got a
lousy husband.” She, too, enumerated the many reasons why.
“You’re right,” the rabbi said again, “He
really is lousy.”
The rabbi’s wife, working in the next room,
overheard both discussions. Afterwards, she said, “Yankel,
their stories were contradictory, but you told them both they
were right. You know as well as I do that they can’t both
be right!”
“Hmm,” the rabbi said. “You know what?
You’re right, too!”
Complex questions are sometimes difficult
to answer because it’s hard to tell which of the conflicting
answers we hear is correct. Sometimes, however, we face the
opposite problem – sometimes there are too many correct answers.
Such is the case with today’s conflict in
the Middle East.
Like the rabbi in the story, I have
visitors to my study, too. Only on this issue, my visitors
aren’t people; they are ideas – ideas that have emerged from the
pain plaguing so many of us who care about that part of the
world.
My first visitor is the voice of Safety –
a supporter Israeli policy. Safety says, “Rabbi, the Israelis
aren’t the aggressors here. They are just defending themselves
against terrorism. The Israelis want peace. They’ve repeatedly
offered it to the Palestinians before, only to have those offers
rejected. Israel’s response to the Palestinian
suicide-murderers is precisely what the United States would do
in a similar situation – only less extreme. What hypocrisy it
is for the American government to call upon Israel to stop! The
PLO leadership is clearly uninterested in peace, so in the
current situation, Israel is simply defending herself. This
mess isn’t Israel’s fault.”
And I say, “You’re right. You are
absolutely right.”
But then my next visitor arrives – Hope, a
peacenik who is stubbornly optimistic even when optimism seems
foolish and naive. Hope says, “It is time to move ahead. The
Israelis say the Palestinians are the aggressors, the
Palestinians say the Israelis are the aggressors. Each feels it
has history on its side, and that its present-day responses are
just. Who is right? It doesn’t matter! In fact, asking ‘Who
is right?’ is actually destructive – the question doesn’t move
us forward at all, and mires us in conflict and violence,
instead.
“What we need here is vision – vision of a
good end to this violence, vision of a Middle East in which, if
all these warring groups can’t be friends, they at least would
be polite neighbors.”
And I respond, “Y’know what? You’re
right.”
Hope leaves, and I think I see Hope and
Safety slug in out in the yard – not a pretty sight.
Then my wife comes over (yes, I’m
unmarried now, but this is an allegory, OK?). “Look
here,” says my wife, “they both can’t be right! If, Safety is
right, then it’s not Israel’s fault. If it truly is terrorism
that Israel is facing, then Israel should fight back, and fight
back hard. And if Israel is in the right, then the United
States should be giving Israel its full, unwavering support.
Often, we need to be evenhanded, but not with terrorists!
“However,” my lovely wife continues, “if
Hope has it right, then it’s different. If Hope is right, then
all we should be doing is looking forward. In that case,
military responses to even the most despicable terrorist acts
must be wrong. Hope says that violence of any kind locks us in
the past, and that we must instead look to the golden sunrise on
the future horizon.
“Hey, bub,” my wife continues, “Hope and
Safety disagree – they can’t both be right.”
I almost tell her that she’s right, too,
for I’ve learned that that’s always the safest answer. Instead,
I stop myself. “No, dear, here [ital]you[ital] are the one who
is wrong. Israel needs to defend the lives of its citizens – to
do otherwise would be irresponsible. Sadly, the murderous
terrorists have forced Israel to take up arms. Hope needs to
grow up a little, for when all else fails, sometimes even the
good guys need to get violent. So, Safety is right.
But let’s listen to Hope, too. Vision,
not hatred or fear, should be the force that guides Israel and
the Palestinians these days. Israelis had that vision a couple
of years ago when an agreement with the Palestinians seemed
imminent. Now that things are worse, they dare not abandon it.
Otherwise, they are doomed to eternal war.
“My dear, Israel must protect herself,
and we all must look to the future’s great promise of Hope.
Only when we do both will we be able to put the current conflict
in Israel behind us with dignity.
“Safety is right, and Hope is right, too.”
My wife sat pensive for a moment. Finally,
she said, “You know what, honey? It think I agree. For once…I
think you’re right.”
[back
to top]
|