The Holy Books of Judaism: Midrash
Sermon, July 15, 2005
Rabbi Bruce Kadden
Most Jews have heard the story of Abraham and the idols.
One day, when Abraham’s father had to go away on business, he left Abraham in
charge of his idol shop. Abraham took a stick and smashed all of the idols
except the largest one. He placed the stick next to the largest idol.
When his father returned, he could not believe his eyes.
“What happened,” he asked. Abraham responded, “You would not believe it. That
big idol took this stick and smashed all of the other idols!”
“That’s ridiculous!” his father said, “Idols can’t do
that.”
“Then why do people buy them and pray to them asking them
to do many things?”
What many Jews do not realize is that this story is not
contained in the Torah. If you read the book of Genesis you will not find it.
This story and many similar to it are found in the Midrash.
The word Midrash comes from the Hebrew root dalet-resh-shin,
meaning to seek or inquire or expound or interpret. A Midrash is an attempt to
interpret a text, usually the Bible. Now, no single book contains all the
Midrash. Rather, there are many different collections of Midrashim which were
compiled throughout Jewish history, beginning in the fourth century (C.E.).
Like the Mishnah, which I discussed last week, Midrash was
originally passed down orally, and is considered part of the Oral Torah which
God gave Moses at Mt. Sinai. Eventually, it became necessary to collect and
edit the Midrash so that they would be preserved for future generations.
Midrashim pertaining to Genesis were collected into a work
entitled Beresheet Rabbah, the Great Genesis. Midrashim
pertaining to portions of Exodus were collected into a work called the
Mechilta of Rabbi Ishmael, the Treatise of Rabbi Ishmael. A few
centuries later, another collection of Midrashim about Exodus was created and
called Sh’mot Rabbah, the Great Exodus.
In fact, there are many different collections of Midrashim
on the books of the Torah compiled in different places in different centuries.
A particular story or Midrash will often be found in many collections, and it is
possible to trace the development of a particular Midrash through a number of
stages. The Talmud contains many Midrashim that are also found in collections
of Midrash, and some that are only found in the Talmud.
And since Midrash is a process of textual interpretation,
it continues to this day. When writers such as Elie Wiesel offer their
interpretations of biblical stories, they are creating what is sometimes called
modern Midrash.
Collections of Midrash fall into two categories: Midrash
halachah and Midrash aggadah. Midrash halachah, legal Midrash, helps us
understand and interpret the laws of Torah. For example, in Leviticus we are
told, “You shall not take vengeance, nor bear a grudge…” (19:18). The midrash
explains these statements thusly: “If a person says, ‘I will not lend you the
tool you require, because you did not lend it to me when I asked for it,’ that
is vengeance. If a person says, ‘I will lend you the tool even though you
refused to lend it when I asked for it,’ that is bearing a grudge.”
Another example of midrash halachah is the rabbis’
interpretation of the biblical teaching “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a
tooth.” (Exodus 21). Rather than interpret this verse literally, the rabbis
insisted that the text referred to monetary compensation. The rabbis recognized
that stories were often the best way to clarify and explain biblical passages,
even legal texts.
All other midrash falls under the category of midrash
aggadah, which includes “narrative literature, parables, theological or ethical
statements, and homilies.” These midrashim were created to fill in the gaps in
the biblical text, to answer the reader’s questions, to expand on the stories
and in many ways to make them relevant to a new generation of readers. Some
collections of midrash are sermons that rabbis gave about a particular Torah
portion or holiday.
Understanding midrash is in many ways like playing
Jeopardy. Midrash is often an answer to a question; but since the question is
not stated, the reader must figure it out. For example, the midrash about
Abraham and the idols answers the question, “Why did God choose Abraham?” The
midrash demonstrates that unlike his fellow countrymen, Abraham rejected idol
worship, and was therefore the ideal person to begin a religion that would
oppose idolatry.
The Bible is an ideal text for the creation of midrash, for
it provides few details in its narrative passages and often raises more
questions than it answers. Literary critic Erich Auerbach, comparing the Bible
to Homer’s Odyssey, wrote that “the Bible is loath to tell us the motivations,
feelings, or thoughts of characters. Rarely giving us descriptive details of
people or places, it is written in a stark, uncompromising style.” (Holtz,
Back to the Sources, p. 180).
Barry Holtz writes, “Midrash comes to fill in the gaps, to
tell us the details that the Bible teasingly leaves out: what did Isaac think
as his father took him to be sacrificed? The Bible doesn’t tell us, but Midrash
fills it in with rich and varied descriptions. Why did Cain kill Abel? Once
gain the Bible is silent, but Midrash is filled with explanation…. The human
mind desires answers, motivations, explanations. Where the Bible is mysterious
and silent, Midrash comes to unravel the mystery.”
James Kugel suggests that the process of creating midrash
in ancient times was similar to the process of circulating jokes in our day. He
writes that midrashim “were a kind of joking, a learned and sophisticated play
about the biblical text, and like jokes they were passed on, modified and
improved as they went, until a great many of them eventually entered into the
common inheritance of every Jew, passed on in learning with the text of the
Bible itself.” (Prooftexts, vol.3, no. 2, p. 147).
Midrash was limited only by the imagination of the rabbis
and some had incredible imaginations. For example, in the first chapter of
Genesis, God says: “Let us make man in our image” (1:26). You are probably
thinking: Who is “us”? So were the rabbis, who offered this answer:
“When God came to create the first human being, the
ministering angels divided into groups and parties, some saying: ‘Let him not
be created,’ and others saying: ‘Let him be created….’ The angel of mercy
said: ‘Let him be created for he will be merciful,’ but the angel of truth
said: ‘Let him not be created for he will be all lies.’ The angel of
righteousness said: ‘Let him be created, for he will do righteous deeds;’ the
angel of peace said: ‘Let him not be created, for he is full of strife.’ While
the angels were arguing, God created the first human being and said: ‘Why do
you argue? A human being is already made.’” (Beresheet Rabbah 8:5)
This midrash is only one of many which answer the
question. The rabbis were not fundamentalists, searching for the right answer
or the correct interpretation. Rather, they understood that there could be a
variety of answers to a given question, and each one could add to our
appreciation of the text.
Midrash, thus provides a virtually unlimited source for
biblical interpretation, as rabbis and other readers attempt to better
understand the text, to make it relevant to their lives and to pass it on to the
next generation. We not only can see how individuals throughout Jewish history
made meaning of these stories, but we, too, can participate in the process of
creating midrash.
[back to list of sermons]
[back to top] |